Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:From Hill Station (Freetown) to Downtown Conakry (First Ward): Comparing French and British Approaches to Segregation in Colonial Cities at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century
Author:Goerg, OdileISNI
Year:1998
Periodical:Canadian Journal of African Studies
Volume:32
Issue:1
Pages:1-31
Language:English
Geographic terms:Sierra Leone
Guinea
Subjects:segregation
colonialism
urban history
Urbanization and Migration
Ethnic and Race Relations
History and Exploration
External link:https://www.jstor.org/stable/486222
Abstract:This article uses the examples of Freetown (Sierra Leone) and Conakry (Guinea) to illustrate changes in urban colonial policy at the turn of the 20th century. Despite differences in the historical development of Freetown (founded by the British in 1787) and Conakry (founded by the French in 1885), around 1900 separation measures began to be implemented in both cities, which reflected the contemporary discourse on hygiene and urban sanitation. In British Africa, residential segregation took its inspiration from India, where summer locations, known as 'Hill Stations', were built for the British. A separate residential quarter, six miles from Freetown, was built in 1902-1904. The French adopted a somewhat different approach. Influenced by assimilation theory, French urban policy was based not on race, but on living standards and cultural characteristics. First two, then three zones were distinguished in Conakry, the first zone being the closest to the seat of the colonial administration and therefore the most expensive. The result in both cases was a dualism between the 'white city' and the African districts or 'villages'. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. in French.
Views
Cover