Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:Eradicating delay in the prosecution of crimes of genocide in Rwanda through 'gacaca' courts: will any form of justice do?
Author:Mwenifumbo, A.W.ISNI
Year:2007
Periodical:East African Journal of Peace and Human Rights (ISSN 1021-8858)
Volume:13
Issue:2
Pages:309-320
Language:English
Notes:biblio. refs.
Geographic terms:Rwanda
East Africa
Subjects:gacaca
legal procedure
genocide
law
Criminal justice, Administration of
Gacaca justice system
Trials (Genocide)
External link:https://www.ajol.info/index.php/eajphr/article/view/39356
Abstract:After the 1994 genocide, Rwanda adopted a strict retributive justice model. The objective was to ensure accountability by all who had participated in the genocide, not just the planners and instigators, but every participant. However, the judiciary did not have the capacity to try all cases. In 1996, a new law was adopted that reintroduced the 'gacaca' system of justice (a community-based model of conflict resolution, originally used to resolve disputes around land rights, theft, etc.) in order to help in the eradication of delay in prosecution. However, there are bounteous arguments for and against the system in respect of the due process guarantees it affords. The present paper criticizes the very competence of the 'gacaca' courts, arguing that, no matter how expedient the mechanisms for eradicating delay in the prosecution of genocide, the incompetence of the 'gacaca' judges ('inyangamugayo') would lead to miscarriages of justice and the benevolent goal to eradicate delay is futile. Notes, ref., sum. [ASC Leiden abstract]