Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:Changing youth dynamics in Lusaka's informal economy in the context of economic liberalization
Author:Hansen, Karen TranbergISNI
Year:2009
Periodical:African Studies Quarterly (ISSN 1093-2658)
Volume:11
Issue:2-3
Pages:13-27
Language:English
Geographic term:Zambia
Subjects:market vendors
urban planning
informal sector
conflict
External link:http://asq.africa.ufl.edu/files/Hansen-Vol11Is2-3.pdf
Abstract:This paper examines the consequences of changes in economic regime on the self-employed in Lusaka, Zambia, and attendant political dynamics. The focus is on urban vendors, particularly youth. The paper discusses how economic restructuring involves new regimes of spatial regulation and new strategies of urban management that have resulted in intensified political tensions and struggles. These struggles arise from the interaction between externally driven agendas and local political dynamics. The paper argues that the relationships between the State and vendors, while long-standing, are today more antagonistic than ever before, in the context of economic liberalization, structural adjustment programmes (SAP), poverty strategy reduction programs (PSRP), and highly indebted poor countries initiative (HIPC). This is demonstrated, firstly, with reference to recurrent controversies between urban regulatory authorities and vendors over access to, control over, and use of market and public space. Occurrences of State imposed removals and relocations of vendors and their responses are discussed. Secondly, political tensions have also emerged from shifts in (State and donor driven) strategies for market management. Tracing the history of market management forms in Lusaka and the legacy of political party influence in the markets, the paper describes how the decentralization of market management has increased conflicts between different interests within the markets and reinforced the role of political interest groups, rather than democratizing social relations in the markets. Such top-down shifts in forms of market management have sometimes triggered major clashes in the markets. Bibliogr., note, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views