Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home Islam in Africa Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:'British kadhis' and 'Muslim judges': modernisation, inconsistencies and accommodation in Zanzibar's colonial judiciary
Author:Stockreiter, Elke E.ISNI
Year:2010
Periodical:Journal of Eastern African Studies (ISSN 1753-1055)
Volume:4
Issue:3
Pages:560-576
Language:English
Geographic term:Zanzibar
Subjects:legal pluralism
judges
Islamic law
colonial policy
Link:https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2010.517423
Abstract:Contextualising the creation of Zanzibar's colonial judiciary within the British Empire, this article explores contradictions in the British approach towards the application of Islamic law in this protectorate. The British upheld the existing legal system, 'shari'a', as the fundamental law yet, striving towards uniformity, impartiality and cost effectiveness, they restricted the scope of jurisdiction of 'kadhis', or Muslim judges, introduced Indian codes and provided for the application of Islamic law by British judges. Although the British may not have consciously embarked on merging the roles of judges and 'kadhis', one of the outcomes of their interference with the judicial system was to combine in the one person a secularly trained judge and a religiously educated 'kadhi'. Notes of various colonial officials on the alleged irrationality and arbitrariness of Islamic law suggest that 'kadhis'' accommodation in the colonial judiciary was shaped by continuous British doubt about their suitability as colonial officers, while 'kadhis' implemented colonial decrees, albeit inconsistently. This article argues that underlying differences between judges and 'kadhis' prevailed during the colonial period, while their attempts at a role reversal show adaptation to the colonial legal system, which accommodated 'shari'a' by supervising its application. As the arguments are based on evidence scattered from 1890 until independence in 1963, this paper outlines the scope of colonial views of 'shari'a' rather than provides a chronological overview of changes in these views. Bibliogr., ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views

Cover