Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home Africana Periodical Literature Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:In search of alternatives to pre-emptive immigration detention (or not): a review of recent South African case law
Authors:Le Roux, WesselISNI
Hungwe, ServiousISNI
Year:2011
Periodical:The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa (ISSN 0010-4051)
Volume:44
Issue:2
Pages:139-167
Language:English
Geographic term:South Africa
Subjects:immigration policy
detention
undocumented migrants
international law
human rights
jurisprudence
Abstract:The power to arrest, detain and deport illegal foreigners remains the foundation of immigration control in post-apartheid South Africa. This power is regulated by section 34 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. A clear understanding of the scope and limits of this far-reaching power is essential for a human rights based approach to immigration. In an attempt to contribute to such an understanding, this essay explores whether section 34 authorizes the pre-emptive arrest and detention of illegal foreigners, even before their status can be conclusively determined. Claims that it does often rest on the view that there are no effective alternatives available to immigration detention. However, international law recognizes detentionless deportations, or the so-called Community Assessment and Placement model, as best practice under a number of different international human rights regimes. This international law approach contrasts sharply with the early or pre-emptive detention regime of the Department of Home Affairs in South Africa. A series of recent judgments by the Supreme Court of Appeal provides an opportunity to re-evaluate the lawfulness of this pre-emptive detention policy. After a close reading of these cases, the essay concludes that these judgments are best read against the grain as inaugurating a process of law reform that will hopefully soon culminate in the constructive abolition of pre-emptive immigration detention in South Africa. Notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views
Cover