Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:Anthropology and history in the Southern African Iron Age
Author:Whitelaw, Gavin
Year:2012
Periodical:African Studies (ISSN 1469-2872)
Volume:71
Issue:1
Pages:127-144
Language:English
Geographic term:Southern Africa
Subjects:archaeology
historiography
anthropology
interdisciplinary studies
External link:https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2012.668297
Abstract:An ongoing collaborative initiative by southern African archaeologists and historians has generated two publications: the book 'Five Hundred Years Rediscovered' and a special issue of 'African Studies' (vol. 69, no. 2, 2010). Overall, the initiative is positive. The reviews of research histories in both publications, especially in 'African Studies', take strongly critical positions on archaeology. The critiques, directed generally at anthropological approaches in archaeology, and specifically at ceramic and settlement pattern studies, claim that such approaches fail to generate a socially dynamic, or historical, past. It is nevertheless clear that the critiques rest upon flawed understandings of the concepts criticized. In the case of ceramics, the authors equate style entities, or facies, with social and political homogeneity. In the case of settlement patterns, the authors argue that so-called 'structuralist' models produce an ahistorical past devoid of social dynamism. This article responds to these flaws, first considering the complex relationship between material-cultural entities and people, and secondly showing how settlement models do indeed represent sets of socially dynamic relationships. Further, in advocating an alternative 'historicised' approach some scholars seem not to appreciate either the challenge or significance of archaeological data, and perhaps give aspects of the oral record undue precedence. Bibliogr., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views
Cover