Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database

Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:Discursive traces of genocide in Johannes Spiecker's travel diary (1905-1907)
Author:Siefkes, Martin
Year:2014
Periodical:Journal of Namibian Studies (ISSN 1863-5954)
Volume:16
Pages:83-114
Language:English
Geographic terms:Namibia
Germany
Subjects:Herero revolt
Nama
genocide
concentration camps
missions
Germans
diaries (form)
About person:Johannes Spiecker (1856-1920)
Abstract:In his role as inspector for the Rhenish Missionary Society (RMG), Johannes Spiecker (1856-1920) traveled from 1905-1907 through the Cape Colony and through German South West Africa. During this voyage, he wrote a diary that merits attention in regard to Spiecker's role in the conflict, and to the observations and discussions he reports. This contribution examines the diary with regard to the RMG's efforts at pacification, Spiecker's reports from the concentration camps, the question of the sexual exploitation of the prisoners, the political opinions of Governor von Lindequist and other influential colonial personages, and the military strategy of the Schutztruppe. A specific focus is on new information regarding the genocide question. Spiecker documents two separate incidents where German officers openly speak about the extermination of whole tribes as a possible goal of the German military strategy. This contribution proposes to take the statements of the officers as indicators of what might be called the 'discursive normality' of genocide. In a methodological perspective, the presence and content of discourses, in specific historical situations and on specific topics, should be regarded as complementary evidence in questions where factual evidence is scarce. Discourse analysis, as developed in sociology and linguistics, thus becomes a promising method of historical science, if it is used in combination with historical and source-critical methods. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views