Go to AfricaBib home

Go to AfricaBib home AfricaBib Go to database home

bibliographic database
Line
Previous page New search

The free AfricaBib App for Android is available here

Periodical article Periodical article Leiden University catalogue Leiden University catalogue WorldCat catalogue WorldCat
Title:The role of spatial development frameworks in transformation of the eThekwini Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: reflecting on 20 years of planning
Authors:Musvoto, Godfrey
Lincoln, Gill
Hansmann, Robynne
Year:2016
Periodical:Urban Forum (ISSN 1874-6330)
Volume:27
Issue:2
Pages:187-210
Language:English
Geographic term:South Africa
Subjects:urban planning
urban development
infrastructure
External link:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9272-6
Abstract:In the 20 years since the advent of a democratic government in South Africa, planned expenditure on infrastructure projects by municipalities has been used in part to redress inequalities and socioeconomic distortions created by apartheid. This article assesses the effectiveness of planning instruments to achieve desired transformation in the case of the eThekwini Municipality. The authors evaluated demographic, spatial regional economic, settlement hierarchy, accessibility and functional analysis indicators to assess the eThekwini Spatial Development Framework (SDF) as it applies to the city of Durban, making particular use of the National Population Census results for 2001 and 2011, municipal data on housing and settlement distribution, the municipal evaluation roll, the Industrial Land Study of 2014 and the Eskom household survey of 2009. These data sets were mapped using Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) GIS to analyse spatial changes over the decade from 2001 to 2011 to establish the ways and extent public investment guided by SDFs is responsive to spatial transformation imperatives. The authors found that, although there has been some economic and population growth, in-migration and densification of the inner city, there has been limited spatial transformation of the urban population, many communities still live in poverty, the traditional inequalities prevail and the benefits of democratic dispensation are elusive to many, despite substantial investment in infrastructure. The analysis points to inadequacies of the planning tools and their application to spending public funds. Moreover, SDFs appear to be process and compliance-driven rather than inclusive of stakeholder concerns. The authors argue that they require substantial refinement to achieve the desired results. Bibliogr., sum. [Journal abstract]
Views